CHP
Commentary

One of the chief objectives of our federal government is the protection of our country and our citizens. Section 91 of the Constitution Act places national defence squarely under the control of the federal government.

On Wednesday, July 3, Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland quietly announced yet another cash grab from digital giants like Google, a move that will certainly cost Canadian citizens more for the digital services provided by these companies. These companies are not in the habit of swallowing costs; they invariably pass them on to the consumer.

The significant element I want to focus on is the fact that, in the US, it is presumed that the next President will be either a Republican or a Democrat. However, there is a provision that allows other candidates to seek to have their names on the ballot and—potentially—be elected to the highest office in the land.

The judicial review regarding the City of Hamilton’s refusal of CHP Canada’s bus shelter ad is now scheduled for one full day, during the week of October 28, in Hamilton, ON. Who would have thought that the day would come when an ad reading ‘Woman: An Adult Female’ would be banned from public space?

People have had a history of avoiding responsibility from the very beginning.
CHP policies have a lot to say about personal and governmental responsibilities. That’s because we are responsible.

Year after year, Canadian governments—federal, provincial and even municipal—feel it necessary to provide our tax dollars to giant corporations. You do not have to look far to find examples...

There is a growing body of citizens who are determined to never again let our federal and provincial governments pull the wool over our eyes, destabilize our economy and traumatize our children. In spite of this, globalist activists, pharmaceutical executives, agents of the corrupt media and misguided utopian socialists have forged ahead with plans to give world government bodies even more control over our own.

Canada Post Corporation is losing money. In the last six years, it’s lost $3 billion. Hard to believe if you’ve sent a package lately.

We have—over the past years—seen an increase in unrighteous laws that affect Canadian’s rights and freedoms. While not many of us are happy to give up our rights and freedoms, even fewer are willing to make a stand to preserve those rights and freedoms. Does each individual case create a threat?

All Canadians want their children to be strong and healthy, confident and skilled, with the opportunity to prosper, to have access to services, to be free of fear and to be functional members of a compassionate and thoughtful community. The actions of our current government have sabotaged those hopes and dreams.

Every year, citizens from across Canada—young and old, of all races and ethnic backgrounds—join together at the National March for Life in Ottawa, to show their solidarity with the pre-born . . . and with the elderly, the disabled and other vulnerable members of our society.

After the release of the Federal Budget, Canada’s Premiers warned Ottawa against encroaching on provincial jurisdiction. The letter cautioned Ottawa against “dictating terms” on what our constitution says are exclusively provincial matters.