‘Derivatives’ & economic porn redux
October 20, 2008 | Author: Ron Gray |
A BBC news item this morning caught my eye:
PARIS, Oct. 17, 2008 (BBC)—French Finance Minister Christine Lagarde has called for a special audit of all French banks after Caisse d'Epargne admitted a big trading loss. The mutual savings bank said it lost 600m euros (US$807m; Ã'£466m) in a derivatives trading incident last week.
It reminded me of two Communiqués the CHP had distributed—one last March, and the other a dozen years ago—in which we referred to derivatives as "economic pornography".
March 11 of this year—seven months before the "credit crunch"—the CHP warned:
Patrick Wood, editor of The August Review, writes:"[The] predicted financial meltdown is upon us with a fury. Asset values are collapsing all over the world: residential and commercial real estate, stocks, all forms of credit and some $750 trillion (yes, trillion!) in the fabricated derivatives markets. The FDIC is gearing up for record-level bank failures. It's all coming unglued."
Note the reference to "the fabricated derivatives markets." More than a decade ago, the CHP criticized the formation of derivatives, as well as trading in market indices, as being nothing more than gambling.
Of course, some people call the operation of the stock market itself "gambling", but they are wrong; while it's certainly possible for people to use the stock market like a gambling den, the market actually serves a very useful purpose: the mobilization and monetization of investments in equity, that creates pools of capital.
But derivatives—which are really just guesses about changes in the future relationships of otherwise-unrelated stock prices—and trading in stock market indices, are truly nothing more than gambling; they're closely related to the old "numbers racket", in which people bet on the last four digits of the next day's total of shares traded. No capital is accumulated or monetized, and the operation of the equity market is not facilitated; it's just gambling—the hope to "get rich quick".
In the case of the 1995 collapse of Barings Bank; and in the more recent loss of more than $7 billion by the French Bank, Société Générale; the "rogue traders" who imperilled investors' deposits were caught on the wrong side of betting on heavily-leveraged derivatives.
"Derivatives," someone recently said, "are like jet fuel in the marketplace: when things are going well, they cause the market to soar; but when things go wrong, they turn it into a fireball."
Gambling is immoral because it relies on chance, not on God or on our own efforts, to meet our needs. It, too, is a kind of economic pornography.
The tragedy of our time is that governments have become the biggest promoters of gambling: it gives them revenue without seeming to raise taxes; and it creates "slush funds" of benefits from which they can reward "friends".
Gambling is also harmful to society because government-sponsored gambling provides a means of laundering the proceeds of crimes like prostitution and drug-dealing.
Government-promoted gambling like the lotteries is economic pornography; it preys upon those least able to afford a loss, holding out the vain hope of "a big win."
CBC Radio's Danny Finkleman used to call the lottery "a tax on stupidity."
We're not reprinting this message to say "I told you so." These warnings, now as then, are issued as a call to wake up to reality. False weights and measures—any form of swindle—is an abomination. Deficit spending is theft from our own children. For 20 years, only the CHP has stood against the Keynsian economics that promise something for nothing. That empty promise has now become a purse full of holes.
As with all porn, real people are really hurt when the fantasies come unglued.
The CHP has a plan (we admit that we borrowed it from Mckenzie King's Liberals of the 1940s—who were very different from the Marxist 'Liberals' that Pierre Trudeau bequeathed to Canada) to inject liquidity into the economy now, when it's most needed. But even that solution will not help Canada unless we also adopt the CHP's plan to treat the National Debt like a national mortgage, and pay it off at about $4 billion a month over the next 20 years.
Explore www.chp.ca to learn more about viable, honest, non-Keynsian policies that Canada needs right now.
Other Commentary by Ron Gray:
- Political Daydreams Are Becoming Nightmares—Time to Wake Up!
- Is it Conflict of Interest or Criminal Intent? Or Both?
- A New Offence by the Federal Liberals: Defacing Our Flag
- Liberals Win; Canadians Lose
- Economic Conservatism Misses the Point
- Six Dangers Canada Faces
- Fact-checking the UN’s global government ‘Pact for the Future’: Is Canada’s $5 billion pledge buying a ‘golden parachute’?
- The Lies That Shackle Most Churches in Canada
- Trudeau’s Kiddie Kabinet
- The Looming Attack on All Canadians’ Private Property Rights
- What’s Wrong With Parliament?
- Public / Private Partnerships: Today’s Fascism